The starting point.
The research gathers information on the relevant front signs, but the result is not interpreted by counting only the identical matches. We need to read signs, owners, products and territories together. It is also useful to document the variants of the name considered, in order to maintain open viable alternatives.
Documents to be collected.
- Name and variants considered
- Products, services and markets
- Search results and date
For each document annotated origin, date and subject that has prepared it. If there are different versions, keep the connection between the initial material and updates. This reconstruction allows to distinguish what is documented by the elements that still require a feedback.
A practical example.
A brand discovers a similar name used for nearby activities. Before deciding whether to change the mark, the comparison organizes the results and identifies the necessary checks on the individual positions.
Illustrative example: does not describe an assignment or a result of LegalMark.
How to arrange the comparison.
Describe the goal of the enterprise, the calendar of activities and the stakeholders involved. It is useful to separate immediate priorities from decisions that depend on further verifications. A first message may contain an unreserved synthesis; complete technical materials and agreements may be shared after defining the methods of comparison.
The dossier must allow you to understand what data is up to date, what positions are to be checked and who can provide the missing information. The next path depends on the circumstances of the case: the initial collection of documents does not guarantee the outcome of a registration, negotiation or contestation.
Read more about the related services → · Find your area of protection →